Thursday, October 16, 2014

Very much the better



Christ will be glorified in my body, whether by my life or by my death. Life to me, of course, is Christ, but then death would bring me something more; but then again, if living in this body means doing work which is having good results – I do not know what I should choose. I am caught in this dilemma: I want to be gone and be with Christ, which would be very much the better, but for me to stay alive in this body is a more urgent need for your sake.
Avoid anything in your everyday lives that would be unworthy of the gospel of Christ.

Philippians 1:20 – 24, 27

My mother Hinetapora inherited her Catholicism and the deposit of faith. It was a faith that was often tested. My father Angus’ desire for a large family was not necessarily welcomed by Hinetapora, for her the pregnancies were taking a toll of her body and the demands of a large family and their needs meant working outside the home, making ends meet. Humanae Vitae in 1968 impacted firmly on Mum. Paul VI’s encyclical meant – in short – that more pregnancies would ensue, and they did.
My father’s faith in the Church was immovable, my mother’s dented and bruised. The illness that followed these pregnancies meant consulting both physician and priest. And for my mother’s sake and life, she chose life – which meant no further children would be born. That, and the struggle of so many in post-Vatican II, meant that she nurtured her faith in her heart, and while it was not until her last years that her confidence grew and she returned to regular church-going, for her it was a new church, a reinvigorated church and she sought the nourishment of the Sacraments and Word of God to sustain her. In short, she held to the same and one faith – but it was the church which caught up to her. Her reception of the Anointing of the Sick and Communion in the days before her death was uplifting.
Her faith was practical, one she implemented each day. She enriched it with the Rosary said by heart and prayers for her many offspring. It was in what she did for others that she made a difference. Faith makes that difference.
Most of you would have similar stories, or at least stories where at life’s end, there is an openness to death, a welcoming, even a desiring of the inevitable. The fear of death no longer holds sway. For we whose bodies can still work to bring about “good results” for the Kingdom, we are urgently needed right here and now. For those who have lived full and long lives, letting go of this life means choosing something “very much the better”.
The Johnny-come-latelys, the life-long faithful , and those who found a change of heart will all receive the same reward (Matthew 20:1 – 16). That is the nature of the our God’s generosity and love.

Peter




Sunday, September 14, 2014

The Cross at the centre



In the story of Jesus there are pivotal moments, which – if they didn’t occur – might have changed not only Jesus’ ‘destiny’, but ours. As you would be well aware, Jesus’ story sits at the centre of a great and wonderful narrative that begins with the creation story. It follows humanity’s fall and the persistent and loving offer of a covenant relationship with God. Humanity’s rejection results in the ultimate gift – the Incarnation of God in the person of Jesus. His ministry culminates in his rejection, Passion, death on the Cross and Resurrection. With the sending of the Holy Spirit, the life of the Church continues the story until the end of time.

Paul had a clear understanding that these events were necessary for God’s plan for all humanity’s salvation.

Something happened in many places in the 70s and 80s. We became “Resurrection People”, and one of its consequences was the disappearance of the corpus from the Cross. It happened at the same time that we Catholics developed a sensitivity, rather than sensibility about the death of Jesus. It was ugly, untidy and better left alone. The crucifix disappeared from various churches, chapels, school foyers and classrooms. It was replaced with Resurrected Christs triumphant before the Cross, or with those attractive Crosses painted with bright biblical scenes.

In one staff meeting we engaged in a robust discussion on this matter. Students, I was told, were fearful of the corpus. I argued that without Jesus’ death on the Cross there was no Resurrection. It is one of the necessary events without which God’s plan would never be completed.

In his letter to the Philippians, Paul outlines in six, compact and dense hymnic verses the core of the kerygma. The divine becomes incarnate in Jesus, in his humility he accepts what is ordained for him, his death on the Cross, and his being raised to glory that we may all worship him.

Today is the feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross and marks the dedication of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in 335 AD where nine years earlier St Helena discovered the True Cross.

The Cross will and must remain front and centre.



Peter


New priests for Archdiocese of Hobart


The Archbishop of Hobart has announced the appointment of two new priests to the Archdiocese. The first is Fr Seraph Balmadres. Fr Seraph is from the Diocese of Baguio, Philippines. He has several relatives in Australia and has spent time in Australia over the years visiting relatives and friends. With Fr John McKay on extended sick leave,  Fr Seraph will be appointed as Administrator of Campbell Town Parish. Fr Seraph will arrive in Hobart on 15 September and will take over responsibilities for Campbell Town Parish on 22 September

The second priest is Fr Gnanapgragash Suresh. Fr Suresh is originally from India, but currently serving in the Diocese of Armidale in NSW. He is therefore very familiar with the pastoral context of the Church in Australia. Fr Suresh will arrive in Hobart on 7 January 2015 and will take responsibility for the Claremont Parish (currently part of Bridgewater-Brighton Parish) on 10 January



From Larmenier




From Marist Regional College





From Our Lady of Mercy


From Our Lady of Lourdes



From St Brendan-Shaw College



From Sacred Heart, Launceston



From Sacred Heart, Ulverstone





From St Joseph's, Queenstown



From Star of the Sea College



From St Patrick's College



From St Patrick's, Latrobe



From St Peter Chanel



From St Brigid's



From Stella Maris



From St Thomas More's



Do you know about Taz Kids support?



Taz Kids will work with your children at your school. 

Sunday, September 7, 2014

The obligation to love



Avoid getting into debt, except the debt of mutual love. If you love your fellow men you have carried out your obligations. All the commandments: You shall not commit adultery, you shall not kill, you shall not steal, you shall not covet, and so on, are summed up in this single command: You must love your neighbour as yourself. Love is the one thing that cannot hurt your neighbour; that is why it is the answer to every one of the commandments.

Romans 13: 8-10

There are countless times in the classroom when I have spelled out the Great Commandment, about its implications for our relationships, about how love will – with time and commitment – transfigure our relationships into something akin to the way that God loves us. Unremittingly, unconditionally, unfathomably, uncontrollably, unequivocally, unerringly. There are no boundaries to God’s love, but what we are commissioned to do, is to love our neighbour, love each other – as God loves us.

Paul is not suggesting that obeying this Great Commandment means minimising risk of causing hurt or doing as little damage as possible in our relationships. Not at all. Loving our neighbour is an obligation, and if we fulfil this obligation we will not need to consciously attend to or ‘obey’ the commandments, because they will have been fulfilled in spirit and in truth by loving our neighbour. Indeed, failing to love, means failing to keep the commandments.

In his ministry Jesus persistently challenged the Pharisees to move beyond their nominal obedience to commandments to fulfilling the commandments by loving: where it is fulfilled not by an internal, self-discipline, but is completed by extending oneself, reaching beyond oneself in self-giving love. The Pharisees couldn’t see it. And in truth, most of us don’t either. It is easier to obey the Decalogue and claim we are compliant and sin-free, and to address the failures of others.

The world in which we live is governed by innumerable laws, regulations, guidelines from our three tiers of government, and the courts and bureaucracies that spawn volumes of interpretations and applications. It is, in fact, no different than the Palestine of Jesus’ time. So, if we feel overwhelmed by the political correctness and social imposts of the 21st century, the obligation to love is no less today than it was for Paul. If anything, our world is yearning to be transfigured from its crucifix of pain, to a resurrected, life-giving City of God.



Peter



Mark Workman farewell





After the Monica Brown day at St Thomas More's on Friday 19 September 2014, there will be a farewell afternoon tea for Mark Workman at a venue yet to be confirmed. All principals and TCEO staff are most welcome to attend. Beginning at about 3.45 p.m. 


Peter's whereabouts for the next 2 weeks






Meetings coming up

Please forward any agenda items for meetings (with some indication of time required and context) to Carole at carole.goodwin@catholic.tas.edu.au 




Workplace WHS training





AROUND THE SCHOOLS


From Larmenier


From St Brigid's 







From St Peter Chanel




From Stella Maris




From Marist



From Sacred Heart, Ulverstone






From St Patrick's, Latrobe




From St Thomas More's





From Our Lady of Lourdes






From St Joseph's, Queenstown



From St Anthony's




From St Brendan-Shaw




From St Patrick's, Prospect





From Star of the Sea




From Sacred Heart, Launceston